Want to become a research fellow? Check out the “opportunities” tab!
Dr. Katharina Stevens (Co-Director of the CTCE)
email: katharina.stevens@uleth.ca

Kat Stevens is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Lethbridge. She specializes in Argumentation Theory, specifically the ethics of argumentation and arguing with precedents. She is the co-editor of the journal Informal Logic, which will soon move to the University of Lethbridge. She is also a co-organizer of the Online Speaker Series on the Ethics of Argumentation. She recently published a monograph on “The Ethics of Argumentation”. Right now, she is working on a supplemental textbook on the ethics of argumentation for critical thinking courses called “How to Argue without being a Jerk”. Her new research project addresses voice allocation in interpersonal argumentation.
You can find a list of her publications here and here.
If you want to do a project having to do with the ethics of argumentation, voice and silencing in argumentation, or argumentation theory and critical thinking education in general, take a look at our “opportunities” tab and contact her.
Dr. Susan Dieleman (Co-Director of the CTCE)
email: susan.dieleman@uleth.ca

Susan Dieleman is an Associate Professor of Philosophy and Jarislowsky Chair in Trust & Political Leadership at the University of Lethbridge. She specializes in political philosophy, pragmatism, and feminist philosophy, focusing on questions about how to make democracy more inclusive and just. She is a co-editor of and contributor to The Ethics of Richard Rorty: Moral Communities, Self-Transformation, and Imagination as well as Pragmatism and Justice. Currently, she is working on a monograph that develops a nonideal theory of deliberative democracy informed by pragmatist and feminist theory, as well as a series of projects on the nature of trust and the relationship between distrust and resistance movements.
You can find a list of her publications on her PhilPeople profile here, her ORCiD profile here, or her Google Scholar profile here. You can learn more about the Network of Jarislowsky Chairs in Trust & Political Leadership here.
If you want to do a project having to do with dis/trust and/or deliberation, take a look at our “opportunities” tab and contact her.
Dr. Trudy Govier

Trudy Govier is a Canadian philosopher best known for her work in the areas of informal logic and social philosophy. She has taught at Trent University, the University of Calgary, and the University of Lethbridge. Her many books and papers include the widely used text A Practical Study of Argument (seven editions); Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation; The Philosophy of Argument; Forgiveness and Revenge; and Dilemmas of Trust.
Trudy has a strong interest in issues of peace and conflict and was a co-founder in 1982 of the Calgary Ploughshares group, initially a branch of the national group, Project Ploughshares. She has also worked with Healthy Calgary, the Calgary United Way, the Calgary Birth Control Association and the Calgary Association for Lifetime Learners.
Trudy retired in 2012 but remains active, initiating projects and responding to request, especially in the area of informal logic.
Dr. Yale Belanger
email: belayd@uleth.ca

Yale Belanger is a Professor of Political Science at the University of Lethbridge. His current project addresses the misinformation, disinformation and polarization that characterizes the public perception of homelessness.
Here is how he describes his project: I’ve started analyzing how small-city media outlets and municipal governments frame homelessness, focusing on how these narratives shape public perception and policy. What concerns me most is the prevalence of misinformation and disinformation, especially when homelessness is portrayed primarily as a public safety issue. Why do local leaders increasingly default to these alarmist portrayals? And how does this affect how residents perceive the issue?
This use of fear-based rhetoric isn’t new—it’s a longstanding political tactic. As homelessness becomes more visible and complex, the public discourse has also grown more polarized as the institutions that present homelessness as a threat to community stability are, arguably, themselves contributing to the very instability they claim to oppose. By critically examining and confronting these narratives, I aim to help create space for dialogue that moves beyond fear, reducing polarization and encouraging more thoughtful, practical responses.
Dr. Nicholas Dunn
email: nicholas.dunn@uleth.ca

Nicholas Dunn is an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Lethbridge. His primary research project aims to understand the nature of judgment as a capacity of the mind across the various spheres of human life, especially the moral and political domains. He has published on topics such as disagreement, polarization, imagination, and affectivity – drawing, in particular, on the thought of Immanuel Kant and Hannah Arendt. He is co-editing a forthcoming special issue of Philosophy & Rhetoric on the theme of the desirability of thinking and speaking with others (with Nirvana Tanoukhi, Dartmouth College). He is also the editor of a forthcoming volume on Hannah Arendt’s Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy (De Gruyter Brill). His latest project examines the relationship between human judgment and artificial intelligence, as well as the impact of AI on critical thinking. Nicholas received his PhD from McGill University. He joined the University of Lethbridge in 2025. To learn more about his work, visit here.